It is possible to paraphrase this argument in the
gay-rights debate. Anti-gays are fond
of saying that homosexuality is wrong because it is against God’s will. They point to all the Bible verses that
support this point. Were Socrates to get
in on this argument, he would no doubt go all Columbo on their asses and say, “Well,
obviously you know more about this than I do, but there is just one little
thing I don’t quite understand. Is
homosexuality wrong SIMPLY because God says that it’s wrong or is there
something inherently wrong with it that caused God to say not to do it?”
“If” Socrates would continue, ”you say that it is wrong
JUST because God said it’s wrong and no other reason, then you make God out to
be capricious in condemning people that did nothing wrong. On the other hand,
if God said it’s wrong because there is something independently wrong with it, you need to
describe what that thing is.”
When asked this question, anti-gay activists are
perplexed and try to dodge the question entirely. Using authority as a reason to be against
something is a failed argument. The anti-gay attorneys at the recent Supreme
Court hearings hit this wall. Because of
the first amendment, they were precluded from using religious reasons for why DOMA
and Prop 8 were constitutional, and their attempts at finding secular
rationales were laughable. The best
argument they could come up with, and the focus of their case, was that only heterosexual
marriages were valid because they were the only kinds of couplings that could
produce children accidentally. WTF?
I am still waiting for some Christian to answer this
question for me. Kindly send your
reasoned responses as commentary to this blog entry. (note: saying "because...because....fuck you!" is NOT a reasoned response.)
No comments:
Post a Comment